Blog

  • Seospidy’s Digital Marketing Work Helps Cleanz24 Cross 100 Stores Across India

    New Delhi, India, August 3rd, 2026, ZEX PR WIRE— Cleanz24, the laundry and dry-cleaning franchise, has just crossed the 100-store mark across India. Behind a good part of that growth is Seospidy, the Delhi-based digital marketing and web design agency that’s been running Cleanz24’s online presence for the past several years — store by store, city by city.

    Franchise businesses run into a problem that single-location businesses don’t: every new outlet needs to show up in its own local search results, but the brand still has to look and feel like one company everywhere. Get that balance wrong, and you either water down the brand or leave half your stores invisible to the customers standing three blocks away from them. That’s the gap Seospidy was brought in to close.

    “With a franchise like Cleanz24, you’re not marketing one business — you’re marketing a hundred of them under one name,” said a spokesperson for Seospidy. “Someone searching for dry cleaning near them in Pune shouldn’t get a worse experience than someone in Ahmedabad. Every store needs its own visibility, its own reviews, its own local ranking — and none of it can feel disconnected from the brand.”

    Seospidy’s work with Cleanz24 covers a fairly wide stretch of what franchise digital marketing actually involves. That includes setting up and optimizing Google Business Profiles for each outlet, building city- and locality-specific landing pages instead of one generic “find a store” page, running paid search and social campaigns tuned to local search intent, and managing a lead funnel that routes franchise inquiries and customer bookings to the right place. None of this is unusual on its own — what’s harder is doing it consistently across 100-plus locations without the whole thing turning into a mess of duplicate content and inconsistent branding.

    That consistency is part of why Cleanz24 has been able to scale as fast as it has. Franchise growth lives or dies on two things: how easy it is for a new franchisee to get their store visible from day one, and how well the brand converts inquiries into paying customers once people find it. Seospidy built templated but locally-optimized web pages for each new store, so a fresh outlet doesn’t start from zero on search visibility — it inherits a structure that already works, tailored to the store’s neighborhood and search behavior.

    “The biggest mistake we see with franchise marketing is treating every location like a mini version of the corporate website,” the spokesperson added. “That doesn’t rank locally, and it doesn’t convert either. People want to know a laundry service is actually near them and actually reliable — not just that the brand exists.”

    Cleanz24’s expansion to over 100 stores pan-India puts it among the more visible names in the country’s organized laundry and dry-cleaning sector, a category that’s still largely served by unorganized local players. Seospidy’s role has been to make sure that as the brand adds locations, its digital footprint scales at the same pace — rather than lagging behind store openings, which is a common failure point for fast-growing franchise chains.

    The rollout hasn’t looked the same in every city. A store opening in a metro with heavy existing competition needs a different keyword and content strategy than one opening in a smaller city where Cleanz24 might be the first organized laundry brand locals have seen. Seospidy’s approach has been to build a repeatable framework — a checklist of what every new store needs online, from Business Profile setup to review requests to local landing page content — and then adjust the specifics store by store rather than applying a single national template everywhere. That’s slower than a blanket rollout, but it’s part of why individual stores have been able to start showing up in local search within weeks of opening rather than months.

    Tracking has also had to happen at the store level, not just the brand level. Seospidy monitors call volume, booking requests, and review counts per outlet, which lets the Cleanz24 team see which new locations are ramping up on schedule and which ones need extra attention — whether that’s more local content, more review outreach, or adjusted ad spend for that specific market.

    Seospidy operates as a full-service digital marketing and web design agency working with businesses across Delhi NCR and beyond. Its service lines include website design company in Gurgaon work for businesses across the city, website designing in Faridabad for local and regional brands, and website design company in Noida projects for companies expanding their digital presence in the NCR belt. The agency also runs a website design company in Greater Noida practice for businesses in the newer development corridors, alongside its affordable SEO company in Delhi services for businesses that need visibility without enterprise-level budgets.

    For franchise brands specifically, Seospidy positions its offering around the same problem it solved for Cleanz24: making sure that growth on the ground — new stores, new cities, new franchisees — is matched by growth online, rather than leaving newer locations to fend for themselves in search results.

    “A hundred stores is a milestone for Cleanz24, but from where we sit, it’s really a hundred separate local SEO problems that had to be solved without breaking the brand,” the spokesperson said. “That’s the part of franchise marketing that doesn’t get talked about enough.”

    Cleanz24 and Seospidy have not disclosed specific figures on lead volume or revenue attributable to the digital marketing engagement, though both companies point to the store count as the clearest external signal of the partnership’s trajectory.

    About Seospidy Seospidy is a Delhi NCR-based digital marketing and web design agency offering website design, local SEO, and franchise digital growth services to businesses across India. The agency works with single-location businesses and multi-store franchise brands alike, building out web presence, local search visibility, and lead generation systems tailored to each market.

    About Cleanz24 Cleanz24 is a laundry and dry-cleaning franchise operating over 100 stores across India, offering pickup, delivery, and in-store garment care services to customers in cities nationwide.

    Media Contact SEOSpidy Web Solution Address: 1816, First Floor, Uday Chand Marg, South Extension 1, New Delhi, India Email: info@seospidy.com

  • LeverageOne Strengthens Its Integrated Technology Platform for the Brokerage Industry

    Delaware, United States, August 3rd, 2026, FinanceWire

    LeverageOne, a technology platform developed for companies connected to the brokerage and trading industry, announced the strengthening of its enterprise software offering.

    The platform brings together a range of tools designed to support the commercial, administrative and operational management of brokers, proprietary trading firms, trading academies and other companies connected to the sector.

    LeverageOne has been designed as a configurable technology infrastructure, allowing each company to select and adapt the components that correspond to its operational requirements, organizational structure and commercial identity.

    A Configurable Software Infrastructure

    LeverageOne is designed to reduce the technology fragmentation that may arise when a company needs to engage, implement and coordinate multiple independent systems and technology providers.

    Depending on the selected version, contracted configuration and applicable technical availability, the platform may include tools related to:

    • CRM and client management.
    • Administrative and operational back-office.
    • Trading-related interfaces and technology.
    • User, role and permission management.
    • Tools for organizing and monitoring commercial networks.
    • Operational information dashboards.
    • Tools supporting internal risk management.
    • Connectivity with external systems and technology providers.
    • Visual customization under each client’s commercial identity.

    The availability of each component may vary depending on the product version, contracted scope, client requirements and the technical or commercial conditions applicable to external integrations.

    LeverageOne does not replace the independent providers involved in each company’s technology infrastructure.

    Its role is to provide the software layer through which clients may integrate, configure and manage the systems and technology services required for their operations.

    Implementation Adapted to Each Company

    LeverageOne supports its clients throughout the platform configuration and implementation process.

    Depending on the scope of each project, the implementation process may include:

    • Visual identity customization.
    • Module configuration.
    • Creation of users, roles and access profiles.
    • Permission management.
    • Technical integration with systems selected by the client.
    • Technical and operational testing.
    • Training.
    • Launch preparation.
    • Post-implementation support.

    Each implementation is structured according to the characteristics of the client company, its business model and its operational requirements.

    Where a configuration requires services provided by third parties, the contracting, approval, operation and continued availability of those services will depend on the relevant providers and the agreements entered into by the client company.

    An Ecosystem Designed for Integration

    LeverageOne seeks to provide a technology foundation from which companies can organize different components of their operations within a unified environment.

    The platform’s modular design allows solutions to be implemented progressively, according to the priorities and requirements of each client.

    This structure is intended to facilitate the management of users, processes, operational information and technology integrations while maintaining separation between the different corporate environments configured within the platform.

    LeverageOne will continue to focus on developing flexible, scalable and adaptable infrastructure for companies connected to the industry.

    Technological Nature

    LeverageOne is a software and technology infrastructure platform.

    LeverageOne does not act as a:

    • Broker or dealer.
    • Financial institution.
    • Exchange or organized market.
    • Liquidity provider.
    • Financial or investment adviser.
    • Investment or portfolio manager.
    • Counterparty to transactions.
    • Regulatory or licensing authority.

    LeverageOne does not offer, promote or market financial instruments.

    The platform provides technology tools that may be configured and used by independent companies.

    Each client retains control over its business model, service configuration, commercial relationships and compliance with the obligations applicable to its activities.

    LeverageOne does not grant licenses, registrations, authorizations or regulatory coverage.

    The use of the platform does not imply that LeverageOne supervises, certifies, endorses or guarantees the activities, solvency, regulatory status or legal compliance of the companies using its technology.

    About LeverageOne

    LeverageOne is a configurable technology platform for brokers, proprietary trading firms and other companies connected to the trading industry.

    Its ecosystem brings together client-management, back-office, operational, connectivity and business-administration tools within an infrastructure that may be adapted to each client’s identity and requirements.

    LeverageOne has been developed to help companies organize their technology infrastructure and reduce their dependence on multiple independent systems.

    More information: www.leverageone.tech

    Legal Notice

    LeverageOne is exclusively a technology platform and does not provide financial, investment or brokerage services.

    Companies using LeverageOne technology are independent entities and remain responsible for the configuration and use of their services, as well as for compliance with all legal, regulatory, commercial and consumer-protection obligations applicable to their activities.

    The availability of the modules, integrations and functionalities described may vary depending on the product version, contracted configuration, technical implementation and conditions established by external providers.

    Nothing contained in this communication constitutes an offer, solicitation, investment recommendation, guarantee of performance, guarantee of commercial results or representation regarding the granting or future granting of any regulatory authorization.

    Contact

    Mr.
    Javier Vasquez Palacios
    LeverageOne
    info@leverageone.tech
    +1 (302) 208-8869

  • LeverageOne Strengthens Its Integrated Technology Platform for the Brokerage Industry

    Delaware, United States, August 3rd, 2026, FinanceWire

    LeverageOne, a technology platform developed for companies connected to the brokerage and trading industry, announced the strengthening of its enterprise software offering.

    The platform brings together a range of tools designed to support the commercial, administrative and operational management of brokers, proprietary trading firms, trading academies and other companies connected to the sector.

    LeverageOne has been designed as a configurable technology infrastructure, allowing each company to select and adapt the components that correspond to its operational requirements, organizational structure and commercial identity.

    A Configurable Software Infrastructure

    LeverageOne is designed to reduce the technology fragmentation that may arise when a company needs to engage, implement and coordinate multiple independent systems and technology providers.

    Depending on the selected version, contracted configuration and applicable technical availability, the platform may include tools related to:

    • CRM and client management.
    • Administrative and operational back-office.
    • Trading-related interfaces and technology.
    • User, role and permission management.
    • Tools for organizing and monitoring commercial networks.
    • Operational information dashboards.
    • Tools supporting internal risk management.
    • Connectivity with external systems and technology providers.
    • Visual customization under each client’s commercial identity.

    The availability of each component may vary depending on the product version, contracted scope, client requirements and the technical or commercial conditions applicable to external integrations.

    LeverageOne does not replace the independent providers involved in each company’s technology infrastructure.

    Its role is to provide the software layer through which clients may integrate, configure and manage the systems and technology services required for their operations.

    Implementation Adapted to Each Company

    LeverageOne supports its clients throughout the platform configuration and implementation process.

    Depending on the scope of each project, the implementation process may include:

    • Visual identity customization.
    • Module configuration.
    • Creation of users, roles and access profiles.
    • Permission management.
    • Technical integration with systems selected by the client.
    • Technical and operational testing.
    • Training.
    • Launch preparation.
    • Post-implementation support.

    Each implementation is structured according to the characteristics of the client company, its business model and its operational requirements.

    Where a configuration requires services provided by third parties, the contracting, approval, operation and continued availability of those services will depend on the relevant providers and the agreements entered into by the client company.

    An Ecosystem Designed for Integration

    LeverageOne seeks to provide a technology foundation from which companies can organize different components of their operations within a unified environment.

    The platform’s modular design allows solutions to be implemented progressively, according to the priorities and requirements of each client.

    This structure is intended to facilitate the management of users, processes, operational information and technology integrations while maintaining separation between the different corporate environments configured within the platform.

    LeverageOne will continue to focus on developing flexible, scalable and adaptable infrastructure for companies connected to the industry.

    Technological Nature

    LeverageOne is a software and technology infrastructure platform.

    LeverageOne does not act as a:

    • Broker or dealer.
    • Financial institution.
    • Exchange or organized market.
    • Liquidity provider.
    • Financial or investment adviser.
    • Investment or portfolio manager.
    • Counterparty to transactions.
    • Regulatory or licensing authority.

    LeverageOne does not offer, promote or market financial instruments.

    The platform provides technology tools that may be configured and used by independent companies.

    Each client retains control over its business model, service configuration, commercial relationships and compliance with the obligations applicable to its activities.

    LeverageOne does not grant licenses, registrations, authorizations or regulatory coverage.

    The use of the platform does not imply that LeverageOne supervises, certifies, endorses or guarantees the activities, solvency, regulatory status or legal compliance of the companies using its technology.

    About LeverageOne

    LeverageOne is a configurable technology platform for brokers, proprietary trading firms and other companies connected to the trading industry.

    Its ecosystem brings together client-management, back-office, operational, connectivity and business-administration tools within an infrastructure that may be adapted to each client’s identity and requirements.

    LeverageOne has been developed to help companies organize their technology infrastructure and reduce their dependence on multiple independent systems.

    More information: www.leverageone.tech

    Legal Notice

    LeverageOne is exclusively a technology platform and does not provide financial, investment or brokerage services.

    Companies using LeverageOne technology are independent entities and remain responsible for the configuration and use of their services, as well as for compliance with all legal, regulatory, commercial and consumer-protection obligations applicable to their activities.

    The availability of the modules, integrations and functionalities described may vary depending on the product version, contracted configuration, technical implementation and conditions established by external providers.

    Nothing contained in this communication constitutes an offer, solicitation, investment recommendation, guarantee of performance, guarantee of commercial results or representation regarding the granting or future granting of any regulatory authorization.

    Contact

    Mr.
    Javier Vasquez Palacios
    LeverageOne
    info@leverageone.tech
    +1 (302) 208-8869

  • Digital Heroes publishes 1,000 Plus software buyer guides with a stated rule against invented statistics

    Agency opens its pricing and its editorial standard to public scrutiny across 1,073 industries, from EMS dispatch to grain elevators

    United States, 3rd Aug 2026 — Digital Heroes has published buyer guides for 1,073 distinct software categories at blog.digitalheroesco.com , covering operations that rarely get written about seriously: EMS electronic patient care reporting, computer aided dispatch, gas leak survey, dam safety monitoring, court case management, grain elevator operations, aircraft maintenance records and telecommunications revenue assurance among them.

    The guides carry an editorial rule the agency has made public: no third-party statistic, study or percentage appears anywhere in the corpus. Every number is either the agency’s own delivery experience, framed as such, or a widely known public fact such as a regulation name or a published platform limit.

    The Problem the Guides Address

    A buyer evaluating custom software faces a market where almost nobody publishes a price. Vendors gate quotes behind a sales call. Agencies list capabilities instead of costs. The buyer is asked to commit to a discovery process before learning whether the project is a $60,000 build or a $400,000 one.

    Every one of the 1,403 buyer guides opens with a cost band in the first paragraph, before any argument for hiring anyone. Each also states the conditions under which a custom build is not justified and an off-the-shelf product is the correct choice.

    What the Standard Forbids

    The agency publishes the constraints its own writing must satisfy:

    • No invented statistics. No “studies show”, no “% of companies”. Numbers are first-party delivery experience or public fact.
    • No invented claims about named competitors. The guides name real products and criticise them only on grounds a practitioner can verify: configuration ceilings, integration burden, per-seat economics at scale, data portability, reporting rigidity. No invented pricing, feature gaps, customer counts or legal history.
    • A verdict, including “stay where you are”. A guide that always concludes “build custom” is advertising. Guides state who should keep their current system.
    • Honest trade-offs. Every guide lists the disadvantages of a custom build alongside the benefits.

    Scale and Structure

    • 1,073 industry buyer guides
    • 330 guides on alternatives to named software products
    • 7,480 city guides across 374 cities and 20 software categories
    • 12,475 question and answer pairs
    • Approximately 2.6 million words of body copy

    Each page carries its own generated illustration keyed to that industry’s actual work, structured data for search and AI answer engines, and descriptive alternative text for screen readers.

    Quote

    “Most people shopping for custom software cannot find out what anything costs until they have sat through a sales call. We decided to put the numbers first and accept that some readers will use them to decide not to hire us. A guide that tells you to keep the software you already have is worth more than one that tells you to buy.”

    — Prasun Anand, Digital Heroes

    How to Check This

    The standard is falsifiable and readers are invited to test it. Search the corpus for “studies show” or for a cited percentage attributed to a third party. Compare the cost bands on any two guides in the same category. Read a guide for software the agency does not sell and see whether it still recommends building.

    The guides are free, ungated and require no email address: blog.digitalheroesco.com 

    About Digital Heroes

    Digital Heroes is a software development agency building custom software, ERP, CRM, web, mobile and commerce systems, operating from New York, Delhi, London, Sydney and Lucknow.

    Media Contact

    Digital Heroes
    Email: contact@digitalheroesco.com
    Phone: +1 (917) 998 8141
    Website: digitalheroesco.com 

    Media Contact

    Organization: Digital Heroes

    Contact Person: Support team

    Website: https://digitalheroesco.com/

    Email: Send Email

    Country:United States

    Release id:47833

    The post Digital Heroes publishes 1,000 Plus software buyer guides with a stated rule against invented statistics appeared first on King Newswire. This content is provided by a third-party source.. King Newswire makes no warranties or representations in connection with it. King Newswire is a press release distribution agency and does not endorse or verify the claims made in this release. If you have any complaints or copyright concerns related to this article, please contact the company listed in the ‘Media Contact’ section

    file

  • Free Online Tool Helps Letting Agents Handle Form 3A and Section 8 Compliance Under the Renters’ Rights Act

    United Kingdom, 3rd Aug 2026 – Proptech developer Docubien has released a free online tool that gives letting agents a structured workflow for completing Form 3A, the prescribed notice for Section 8 possession claims under the Renters’ Rights Act.

    The Act abolished Section 21 evictions. Regaining possession now depends on evidencing specific grounds through the court system rather than serving a no-fault notice. Form 3A is the government’s prescribed document for that process, and its layout is fixed: agents cannot substitute their own version or rely on a CRM mail merge to complete it correctly.

    Ministry of Justice figures put the average wait for a standard court possession claim at 34 weeks. For a landlord seeking possession over unpaid rent at the national average, that delay costs around £11,345 in lost rent. If the claim fails because Form 3A was completed incorrectly, starting again can push the loss past £22,000. Agents who made the error are exposed to a claim from their own client on top of that.

    Docubien’s tool is built around that failure point. Before generating a notice, it requires the agent to confirm that the legal conditions for the selected possession ground have been met, including deposit protection, prescribed information, and any active debt moratorium. It provides template wording to explain why a given ground applies, and calculates the earliest date the claim can go to court by cross-referencing the ground, the notice date, and the method of service. The tool connects directly to a number of property CRMs, so agent data doesn’t need to be re-entered by hand, and once the notice is complete it generates a Form N215 as proof of service.

    Thomas Taylor, founder of Docubien, said: “The 34-week court backlog means a claim failing on a badly completed notice is expensive, for the landlord and for the agent who prepared it. We built this specifically to catch the mistakes agents are most likely to make on Form 3A.”

    The Form 3A tool is available now as part of Docubien’s free online tool tier. No subscription is required.

    About Docubien

    Docubien is a proptech provider of document automation, management and distribution software for estate and letting agents. The platform integrates with partner CRMs to generate sales and tenancy documents and manage document templates, reducing manual data entry, tracking document provenance, and recording proof of receipt.

    Media Contact

    Organization: Docubien

    Contact Person: Thomas Taylor

    Website: https://www.docubien.ai/

    Email: Send Email

    Country:United Kingdom

    Release id:47834

    The post Free Online Tool Helps Letting Agents Handle Form 3A and Section 8 Compliance Under the Renters’ Rights Act appeared first on King Newswire. This content is provided by a third-party source.. King Newswire makes no warranties or representations in connection with it. King Newswire is a press release distribution agency and does not endorse or verify the claims made in this release. If you have any complaints or copyright concerns related to this article, please contact the company listed in the ‘Media Contact’ section

    file

  • Dr. Owen Jia Named EAES Academician to Advance Eurasian Digital Innovation & ArTech Cooperation

    China, 3rd Aug 2026 – Dr. Lijun (Owen) Jia, founder of the International Entrepreneurs, Creatives & Innovators Association (IECIA) and the ECI AWARDS, has formally been inducted as an academician of the Eurasian Academy of Engineering Sciences (EAES). The official accreditation certificate was presented by EAES President Academician Alla Yesypenko on the sidelines of the ongoing ECI Global Innovation Tour held in Hangzhou.

    Dr. Jia also holds multiple senior academic posts at a private California university in the U.S., serving as Board Trustee, Vice Chancellor, Dean of the School of Innovation and tenured professor. The prestigious appointment recognizes his trailblazing cross-disciplinary research spanning brand aesthetics, intelligent marketing and ArTech (Art & Technology), alongside decades of hands-on work advancing global digital innovation and cross-border industrial cooperation between China and overseas markets. With this induction, he becomes one of EAES’ standout Chinese academicians focused exclusively on digital innovation.

    A leading independent non-governmental academic body with reach across Eurasia, EAES brings together elite engineers and digital scientists from more than 30 nations. Its academician cohort includes Nobel laureates, national academy fellows and top industry innovators hailing from Russia, Ukraine, Central and Eastern Europe, Southeast Asia, China and other Eurasian territories.

    Built around the core tenet “Connect Civilizations through Science, Foster Peace via Innovation”, EAES operates as a neutral hub for cross-border academic exchange backed by rigorous, competitive academician selection criteria. EAES academician status is widely regarded as a top global academic distinction reserved for scholars and industry leaders who build original academic frameworks and deliver lasting impact on international innovation partnerships.

    With over 20 years dedicated to interdisciplinary digital innovation research, Dr. Jia has developed a fully proprietary academic framework. His published works include the title Brand Aesthetics , Intelligent Marketing and Nine Strategies for Top-Tier Brand Marketing, while his upcoming monograph ArTech: Theory, Practice and the Future is slated for publication in the near term.

    He pioneered a two-way research model that bridges theoretical scholarship and real-world industry application, drawing on on-the-ground commercial insights to continuously refine academic theories. As Global Jury Chair of Effie Worldwide and chief operator of the ECI global innovation platform, Dr. Jia has long facilitated cross-border dialogue within creative tech and the broader digital economy. His induction positions him as EAES’ primary Chinese representative specializing in digital innovation, ArTech and global brand development, creating a vital bridge between the academy’s think tank network and the Asia-Pacific digital innovation landscape.

    During the induction ceremony, EAES and IECIA signed a landmark long-term strategic partnership agreement, outlining four core pillars to align global resources and accelerate joint Eurasian innovation initiatives:

    1. Co-host high-level international academic summits including the Eurasian Academician Innovation Forum, ECI Global Innovation Tour and International Innovation Dialogue Summit. Joint research will dive into frontier topics such as AI deployment, ArTech applications, the low-altitude economy and cross-border corporate expansion strategies.
    2. Launch joint cross-border think tanks to deliver forward-looking research projects and publish industry whitepapers covering digital innovation, brand globalization and new productive forces. Both sides will jointly explore viable cross-border industry-university-research commercialization pathways for artificial intelligence and computing infrastructure.
    3. Roll out reciprocal academic talent exchange and honor credential frameworks. Regular bilateral academician visits and annual induction ceremonies will be organized, while the ECI Young Innovation Laureate Awards will identify and nurture emerging innovators across the globe.
    4. Unlock two-way industrial market access for Eurasian and Asia-Pacific stakeholders. The alliance will collaborate with BRICS cooperation mechanisms, industrial parks and market-leading enterprises to build dedicated matching channels for cross-border technology licensing, brand expansion and capital flow. The partnership will support Chinese firms in global tech-driven expansion while scaling Eurasian technological breakthroughs across the Asia-Pacific region.

    EAES President Academician Alla Yesypenko offered high praise for Dr. Jia during the event.
    “Dr. Jia has established an original academic paradigm for ArTech and digital brand innovation, and spent years building interconnected global innovation exchange networks. His forward-looking mission aligns perfectly with EAES’ founding goal of cross-civilizational dialogue and technology for collective good. We look forward to co-setting a new benchmark for Eurasian innovation collaboration.”

    In his acceptance speech, Dr. Jia emphasized that the pan-Eurasian academic honor belongs to the broader global digital innovation community of academics and industry practitioners.
    “For years, IECIA and ECI have leveraged digital innovation to narrow regional development divides and enable equitable dialogue between diverse civilizations. This recognition is a tremendous boost for our entire team. Moving forward, ECI Academy will deepen ties with EAES to unlock full bidirectional circulation of industrial, academic and youth innovation resources across Eurasia. We will break down cross-regional cooperation barriers powered by innovation, and keep contributing to inclusive global growth and shared prosperity for all civilizations.”

    Supplementary Brief: ECI Global Digital Innovation Ecosystem

    ECI AWARDS (International Digital Innovation Awards)

    Dubbed the “Nobel Prize of Digital Innovation”, ECI AWARDS was launched in the United States back in 2014. It stands as the world’s first international innovation award built around a single core evaluation standard: measurable innovation impact.

    Administered by IECIA, a non-profit organization operating in alignment with the principles of the UN Charter, the body has established its new global headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland. Grounded in the UN Sustainable Development Goals and Global Digital Compact, IECIA runs a full-stack global empowerment platform covering award recognition, academic research & education, professional certification, international innovation festivals and industrial incubation. Guided by its core mission “Bring Innovation to Life”, the organization works to cultivate a balanced, harmonious human-machine digital future.

    Media Contact

    Organization: ECITIMES Innovation Times

    Contact Person: Faye Fang

    Website: https://www.eciawards.org.cn

    Email: Send Email

    Country:China

    Release id:47819

    The post Dr. Owen Jia Named EAES Academician to Advance Eurasian Digital Innovation & ArTech Cooperation appeared first on King Newswire. This content is provided by a third-party source.. King Newswire makes no warranties or representations in connection with it. King Newswire is a press release distribution agency and does not endorse or verify the claims made in this release. If you have any complaints or copyright concerns related to this article, please contact the company listed in the ‘Media Contact’ section

    file

  • Pioneering a New Model for Redistributing Consumer Value Cunion AI Announces Q3 2026 Platform Launch

    San Diego, CA, United States, 3rd Aug 2026 – Cunion AI today announced that its platform will officially launch in the third quarter of 2026. Focused on the ShoppingFi sector, the platform uses a proprietary algorithm to manage the distribution of commercial value generated.

    Positioned by Cunion AI as the flagship application of the ShoppingFi commercial value network protocol, the platform is designed as a “Buy-to-Earn” commerce model that aims to provide rewards linked to consumer activity. Drawing on the concept of Consumption Capital Theory, the platform applies programmable technology and value redistribution rules to return commercial value, including merchant commissions, user data, repeat-purchase value, and network valuation that would otherwise remain locked within centralized platforms. Built upon real consumer activity, supported by genuine business cash flow, and powered by its native token X2026, Cunion AI describes the platform as a Web4-style commerce protocol and explores how it can become part of everyday retail. 

    How the Platform Works 

    Cunion AI treats every shopping cart as the starting point of a rights-bearing event, where each completed order becomes a value-generating transaction. While the consumer experience remains as simple as a conventional online checkout, the platform’s proprietary algorithm allocates value in the background.

    Rewards are funded through real commercial activity, including merchant commissions, supply-chain profits, brand partnership budgets, and VIP subscription fees, rather than new capital inflows. A dynamic distribution formula calculates each user’s entitlement by considering multiple factors, including order commissions, user tier, category incentives, platform-cycle coefficients, and risk-control pass rates. This mechanism is designed to manage risk while limiting speculative bubbles. 

    Rewards accumulate in X2026 tokens and vest linearly over a minimum period of 1,000 days, transforming short-term consumer traffic into long-term ecosystem participation. 

    Consumer Value

    Cunion AI identifies three key drivers of consumer participation:

    • Lower real-world spending costs through rebates.
    • Psychological reinforcement as balances, points, and membership tiers continue to grow.
    • A stronger sense of ownership, enabling consumers to become stakeholders in ecosystem growth rather than remaining passive platform traffic. 

    Merchant Benefits 

    For merchants, Cunion AI offers a more efficient customer acquisition model while strengthening purchase intent. 

    Unlike traditional e-commerce advertising, where marketing budgets are spent upfront without guaranteed conversions, Cunion AI transforms those marketing expenditures into rewards tied directly to completed transactions. As a result, merchants benefit from:

    • Higher conversion certainty, since rewards are based on completed orders rather than clicks.
    • Stronger repeat-purchase behavior through long-term user retention.
    • Reduced advertising waste by directing marketing budgets toward verified buyers.
    • More efficient word-of-mouth growth.
    • A younger and more innovative brand narrative through association with Web4 and ShoppingFi. 

    By redistributing commercial value through token-based rewards, the platform seeks to reduce consumer costs while stimulating new demand and incremental sales growth for merchants. 

    Beyond Traditional Cashback 

    Cunion AI distinguishes itself from conventional cashback platforms by creating a broader commercial value distribution system rather than simply sharing commissions. 

    Traditional cashback applications typically lose user engagement once rewards are claimed. In contrast, Cunion AI states that the platform’s model is based on commercial activity and user participation rather than external capital inflows or token price performance. Within the ecosystem, X2026 functions not only as a consumer incentive but also as a membership credential, governance mechanism, and capital bridge connecting merchants with broader commercial use cases. 

    The Future of ShoppingFi 

    According to Cunion AI, ShoppingFi represents an entirely new category within the digital economy. Consumption is an existing, real-world economic activity rather than artificially created demand. It is frequent, large-scale, and inherently digitalized, yet traditional commerce models have failed to allow consumers to participate in the value created by platform growth. 

    Unlike models such as GameFi or Move-to-Earn, ShoppingFi is built upon one of the world’s largest economic activities, everyday shopping. By connecting blockchain technology with real-world commerce, Cunion AI aims to move Web3 beyond speculation and toward practical commercial adoption. 

    Cunion AI welcomes entrepreneurs, brands, and technology partners worldwide to explore the convergence of the digital economy and physical retail. Additional partnership announcements and ecosystem developments will be released as the platform approaches its official launch.  

    About Cunion AI

    Cunion AI is the flagship application of the ShoppingFi protocol, designed to redistribute commercial value generated through real consumer transactions. Leveraging blockchain technology, proprietary algorithms, and real business cash flow, the platform enables consumers, merchants, and ecosystem participants to share in the value created by everyday commerce while promoting a more transparent and sustainable digital economy.

    Media Contact

    Organization: Cunion INC

    Contact Person: Kevin Gao

    Website: https://www.cunion.ai

    Email: Send Email

    City: San Diego

    State: CA

    Country:United States

    Release id:47685

    The post Pioneering a New Model for Redistributing Consumer Value Cunion AI Announces Q3 2026 Platform Launch appeared first on King Newswire. This content is provided by a third-party source.. King Newswire makes no warranties or representations in connection with it. King Newswire is a press release distribution agency and does not endorse or verify the claims made in this release. If you have any complaints or copyright concerns related to this article, please contact the company listed in the ‘Media Contact’ section

    file

  • BitMart Facing Formal Inquiry from Scandic Coin Over Extended Delays in SNC Token Withdrawal Processing

    Hamburg, Germany, August 3rd, 2026, Chainwire

    SCANDIC COIN (SNC) is once again calling on the cryptocurrency exchange BitMart to process three outstanding withdrawals from the approved institutional account without delay, or to provide a full, written and transaction-specific explanation for their continued non-execution.

    Four PDF documents captured on 3 August 2026 from the BitMart account interface:

    1: https://image-hha.imageproxy.bid/uploads/FireShot_Capture_030_-_BitMart_-_Cryptocurrency_Exchange_-_Buy__sell_Bitcoin,_Ethereum,_Tet__-_www.bitmart.com.pdf

    2: https://image-hha.imageproxy.bid/uploads/FireShot_Capture_027_-_BitMart_-_Cryptocurrency_Exchange_-_Buy__sell_Bitcoin,_Ethereum,_Tet__-_www.bitmart.com.pdf

    3: https://image-hha.imageproxy.bid/uploads/FireShot_Capture_028_-_BitMart_-_Cryptocurrency_Exchange_-_Buy__sell_Bitcoin,_Ethereum,_Tet__-_www.bitmart.com.pdf

    4: https://image-hha.imageproxy.bid/uploads/FireShot_Capture_029_-_BitMart_-_Cryptocurrency_Exchange_-_Buy__sell_Bitcoin,_Ethereum,_Tet__-_www.bitmart.com.pdf

    provide specific transaction data in this regard. These PDF records show the details of the outstanding withdrawals; a fourth page confirms that BitMart had approved the institutional verification of the operating company, which is why the withdrawals must not fail any KYC/KYB or AML checks under any circumstances.

    BitMart’s own records document three withdrawals that remain unprocessed

    The detail pages were saved on 3 August 2026 between 07:15:28 and 07:20:09. The ETH network is shown for all three withdrawals:

    Transaction 31942705 – USDT, ETH network; created on 26 July 2026 at 08:54:11; amount shown 21,898.086448 USDT; fee shown 3.1; no completion date; 0 out of 12 confirmations; status ‘Processing’; TXID ‘No Record’.

    Transaction 31943017 – SNC, ETH network; created on 26 July 2026 at 09:07:20; amount shown 926,634.6 SNC; fee shown 18; no completion date; 0 out of 12 confirmations; status ‘Processing’; TXID “No Record”.

    Transaction 31944747 – USDT, ETH network; created on 26 July 2026 at 10:14:45; amount shown 255.704753 USDT; fee shown 3.1; no completion date; 0 out of 12 confirmations; status ‘Processing’; TXID “No Record”.

    The two USDT records together total exactly 22,153.791201 USDT; in addition, there are 926,634.6 SNC. At the time of the backup, none of the three detail pages showed a completion date or a blockchain transaction ID. All records remained at 0 out of 12 network confirmations. Judging by the creation and backup times visible in the PDFs, the withdrawal orders had been pending for almost eight days at that point.

    A smaller SNC withdrawal, however, is shown as successful

    The ‘Recent Withdrawals’ overview visible on the same BitMart pages also shows transaction 31944807 for 4,332.39 SNC. This withdrawal is shown as having been completed on 27 July 2026 at 11:40:33, with 12 out of 12 confirmations and the status ‘Succeed’.

    This entry does not explain why the three larger withdrawals have still not been processed. However, it does document that, during the relevant period, BitMart recorded at least one other SNC withdrawal as having been successfully completed. This is precisely why a specific explanation is required as to why transactions 31942705, 31943017 and 31944747 were treated differently and had not even been assigned a TXID by 3 August.

    The institutional account had been approved by BitMart

    A fourth BitMart page, archived on 3 August 2026 at 07:23:24, explicitly confirms the approved institutional verification. Among other things, BitMart lists higher deposit and withdrawal limits, the option to set up up to 50 sub-accounts, and uninterrupted VIP customer service as benefits of institutional status. SCANDIC COIN explains that the assets in question were funded by the operating company via a bank transfer from its German business account to BitMart and are economically attributable to the company. According to the company’s account, these are not open trading positions nor are they assets that belong economically to BitMart.

    Approved institutional verification excludes a lawful, transaction-related review in accordance with anti-money laundering, sanctions, security or risk regulations. A blanket reference to compliance would therefore not address the specific facts visible on BitMart’s own platform.

    A public explanation was already demanded on 28 July 2026

    The withdrawal issue was not first made public on 3 August. As early as 27 July 2026, SNC SCANDIC COIN had publicly documented the outstanding withdrawals and expressly demanded an immediate explanation from BitMart – this has still not happened to date, so it must be assumed that there is apparently no longer any staff at BitMart available to respond to press enquiries!

    English:

    https://www.hamburgeranzeiger.de/en/Economy/710079-bitmart-under-pressure-22000-usdt-and-930000-snc-still-not-released-after-48-hours-is-bitmart-running-out-of-funds.html

    Chinese:

    https://www.hamburgeranzeiger.de/Wirtschaft/710086-bitmart-22000-usdt-930000-snc-48-bitmart.html

    Demands were made for either the immediate release of the assets or a detailed written explanation setting out the specific legal, compliance, technical or security-related reason, as well as a binding completion date. BitMart was thus publicly and unambiguously confronted with the specific questions by 28 July at the latest: Why has the withdrawal not been completed? When will the assets be released? And does the platform still have the operational and financial capacity to fulfil legitimate withdrawal requests in full?

    According to SCANDIC COIN, BitMart had still not provided a case-specific explanation as of today, 3 August 2026. Several days after the public request, BitMart’s own pages continue to show the three transactions at 0 out of 12 confirmations, with no completion date and no TXID. The lack of a specific response is therefore not merely a minor communication issue, but a key part of the documented sequence of events.

    The specific sequence of events could strongly suggest that BitMart’s cessation of business operations was not normal or orderly

    BitMart itself described the closure of its trading platform as an orderly, transparent and responsible process and stated that the withdrawal service would remain available. It is precisely against these own commitments that the practical handling of the matter must be measured. An orderly closure presupposes that, in the event of an exceptionally long delay, a verified institutional client receives a concrete, comprehensible and verifiable explanation in a timely manner.

    If three precisely identified withdrawals totalling 22,153,791,201 USDT and 926,634.6 SNC remain stuck without a TXID after nearly eight days, and an explanation publicly requested as early as 28 July has still not been provided by 3 August, this could strongly suggest that the specific process can no longer be classified as a normal and orderly cessation of business operations. This in itself proves neither insolvency nor the unlawful misappropriation of assets. However, it gives rise to substantial, objectively verifiable doubts as to whether BitMart’s announced orderly and transparent winding-up is actually being implemented in this specific case. BitMart must now provide concrete evidence rather than general assurances

    SCANDIC COIN therefore calls on BitMart to immediately:

    1. to execute transactions 31942705, 31943017 and 31944747;
    2. to provide the full TXID for each blockchain transaction executed;
    3. to explain precisely why no blockchain transaction has been generated to date, if this is still the case;
    4. to confirm in writing whether the assets represented by the three withdrawal records are fully available to the operating company of SNC SCANDIC COIN;
    5. to explain why the smaller SNC transaction 31944807 is shown as having been successfully completed, whilst the three larger withdrawals remain at 0 out of 12 confirmations;
    6. to explain why the statement, which was publicly requested as early as 28 July 2026, had not been provided by 3 August 2026, and to specify a binding completion date.

    STATEMENT FROM THE OPERATING COMPANY OF: SNC SCANDIC COIN

    “An orderly winding-up, such as the one BitMart grandly and publicly described as ‘orderly’, must also be orderly in practice.” SNC SCANDIC COIN had already publicly and unequivocally called on BitMart to provide a specific explanation on 28 July 2026. To date, 3 August 2026, to the best of our knowledge, BitMart has provided us with neither the TXIDs nor a satisfactory, transaction-specific explanation. BitMart’s own pages show three precise transaction numbers, exact amounts, exact creation times, 0 out of 12 confirmations, the ongoing status ‘Processing’ and no TXID. The same overview shows a smaller SNC payout as having been successful, whilst the three larger transactions remain outstanding. An orderly winding-up of business operations must also be orderly, transparent and verifiable in practice. Nearly eight days without any blockchain transactions and several days without a response to a public request could strongly suggest that this can no longer be described as a normal settlement process. We demand not speculation, but verifiable facts and the immediate release of our own assets; anything else would constitute deliberate embezzlement and theft. Should this be the case, a criminal complaint would be filed, accompanied by a public media appeal and the publication in the media of photographs of the responsible operators of BitMart.” SCANDIC COIN / SNC: Office@ScandicCoin.dev

    Contact

    Lina Brugger
    Office@ScandicCoin.dev

  • BitMart Facing Formal Inquiry from Scandic Coin Over Extended Delays in SNC Token Withdrawal Processing

    Hamburg, Germany, August 3rd, 2026, Chainwire

    SCANDIC COIN (SNC) is once again calling on the cryptocurrency exchange BitMart to process three outstanding withdrawals from the approved institutional account without delay, or to provide a full, written and transaction-specific explanation for their continued non-execution.

    Four PDF documents captured on 3 August 2026 from the BitMart account interface:

    1: https://image-hha.imageproxy.bid/uploads/FireShot_Capture_030_-_BitMart_-_Cryptocurrency_Exchange_-_Buy__sell_Bitcoin,_Ethereum,_Tet__-_www.bitmart.com.pdf

    2: https://image-hha.imageproxy.bid/uploads/FireShot_Capture_027_-_BitMart_-_Cryptocurrency_Exchange_-_Buy__sell_Bitcoin,_Ethereum,_Tet__-_www.bitmart.com.pdf

    3: https://image-hha.imageproxy.bid/uploads/FireShot_Capture_028_-_BitMart_-_Cryptocurrency_Exchange_-_Buy__sell_Bitcoin,_Ethereum,_Tet__-_www.bitmart.com.pdf

    4: https://image-hha.imageproxy.bid/uploads/FireShot_Capture_029_-_BitMart_-_Cryptocurrency_Exchange_-_Buy__sell_Bitcoin,_Ethereum,_Tet__-_www.bitmart.com.pdf

    provide specific transaction data in this regard. These PDF records show the details of the outstanding withdrawals; a fourth page confirms that BitMart had approved the institutional verification of the operating company, which is why the withdrawals must not fail any KYC/KYB or AML checks under any circumstances.

    BitMart’s own records document three withdrawals that remain unprocessed

    The detail pages were saved on 3 August 2026 between 07:15:28 and 07:20:09. The ETH network is shown for all three withdrawals:

    Transaction 31942705 – USDT, ETH network; created on 26 July 2026 at 08:54:11; amount shown 21,898.086448 USDT; fee shown 3.1; no completion date; 0 out of 12 confirmations; status ‘Processing’; TXID ‘No Record’.

    Transaction 31943017 – SNC, ETH network; created on 26 July 2026 at 09:07:20; amount shown 926,634.6 SNC; fee shown 18; no completion date; 0 out of 12 confirmations; status ‘Processing’; TXID “No Record”.

    Transaction 31944747 – USDT, ETH network; created on 26 July 2026 at 10:14:45; amount shown 255.704753 USDT; fee shown 3.1; no completion date; 0 out of 12 confirmations; status ‘Processing’; TXID “No Record”.

    The two USDT records together total exactly 22,153.791201 USDT; in addition, there are 926,634.6 SNC. At the time of the backup, none of the three detail pages showed a completion date or a blockchain transaction ID. All records remained at 0 out of 12 network confirmations. Judging by the creation and backup times visible in the PDFs, the withdrawal orders had been pending for almost eight days at that point.

    A smaller SNC withdrawal, however, is shown as successful

    The ‘Recent Withdrawals’ overview visible on the same BitMart pages also shows transaction 31944807 for 4,332.39 SNC. This withdrawal is shown as having been completed on 27 July 2026 at 11:40:33, with 12 out of 12 confirmations and the status ‘Succeed’.

    This entry does not explain why the three larger withdrawals have still not been processed. However, it does document that, during the relevant period, BitMart recorded at least one other SNC withdrawal as having been successfully completed. This is precisely why a specific explanation is required as to why transactions 31942705, 31943017 and 31944747 were treated differently and had not even been assigned a TXID by 3 August.

    The institutional account had been approved by BitMart

    A fourth BitMart page, archived on 3 August 2026 at 07:23:24, explicitly confirms the approved institutional verification. Among other things, BitMart lists higher deposit and withdrawal limits, the option to set up up to 50 sub-accounts, and uninterrupted VIP customer service as benefits of institutional status. SCANDIC COIN explains that the assets in question were funded by the operating company via a bank transfer from its German business account to BitMart and are economically attributable to the company. According to the company’s account, these are not open trading positions nor are they assets that belong economically to BitMart.

    Approved institutional verification excludes a lawful, transaction-related review in accordance with anti-money laundering, sanctions, security or risk regulations. A blanket reference to compliance would therefore not address the specific facts visible on BitMart’s own platform.

    A public explanation was already demanded on 28 July 2026

    The withdrawal issue was not first made public on 3 August. As early as 27 July 2026, SNC SCANDIC COIN had publicly documented the outstanding withdrawals and expressly demanded an immediate explanation from BitMart – this has still not happened to date, so it must be assumed that there is apparently no longer any staff at BitMart available to respond to press enquiries!

    English:

    https://www.hamburgeranzeiger.de/en/Economy/710079-bitmart-under-pressure-22000-usdt-and-930000-snc-still-not-released-after-48-hours-is-bitmart-running-out-of-funds.html

    Chinese:

    https://www.hamburgeranzeiger.de/Wirtschaft/710086-bitmart-22000-usdt-930000-snc-48-bitmart.html

    Demands were made for either the immediate release of the assets or a detailed written explanation setting out the specific legal, compliance, technical or security-related reason, as well as a binding completion date. BitMart was thus publicly and unambiguously confronted with the specific questions by 28 July at the latest: Why has the withdrawal not been completed? When will the assets be released? And does the platform still have the operational and financial capacity to fulfil legitimate withdrawal requests in full?

    According to SCANDIC COIN, BitMart had still not provided a case-specific explanation as of today, 3 August 2026. Several days after the public request, BitMart’s own pages continue to show the three transactions at 0 out of 12 confirmations, with no completion date and no TXID. The lack of a specific response is therefore not merely a minor communication issue, but a key part of the documented sequence of events.

    The specific sequence of events could strongly suggest that BitMart’s cessation of business operations was not normal or orderly

    BitMart itself described the closure of its trading platform as an orderly, transparent and responsible process and stated that the withdrawal service would remain available. It is precisely against these own commitments that the practical handling of the matter must be measured. An orderly closure presupposes that, in the event of an exceptionally long delay, a verified institutional client receives a concrete, comprehensible and verifiable explanation in a timely manner.

    If three precisely identified withdrawals totalling 22,153,791,201 USDT and 926,634.6 SNC remain stuck without a TXID after nearly eight days, and an explanation publicly requested as early as 28 July has still not been provided by 3 August, this could strongly suggest that the specific process can no longer be classified as a normal and orderly cessation of business operations. This in itself proves neither insolvency nor the unlawful misappropriation of assets. However, it gives rise to substantial, objectively verifiable doubts as to whether BitMart’s announced orderly and transparent winding-up is actually being implemented in this specific case. BitMart must now provide concrete evidence rather than general assurances

    SCANDIC COIN therefore calls on BitMart to immediately:

    1. to execute transactions 31942705, 31943017 and 31944747;
    2. to provide the full TXID for each blockchain transaction executed;
    3. to explain precisely why no blockchain transaction has been generated to date, if this is still the case;
    4. to confirm in writing whether the assets represented by the three withdrawal records are fully available to the operating company of SNC SCANDIC COIN;
    5. to explain why the smaller SNC transaction 31944807 is shown as having been successfully completed, whilst the three larger withdrawals remain at 0 out of 12 confirmations;
    6. to explain why the statement, which was publicly requested as early as 28 July 2026, had not been provided by 3 August 2026, and to specify a binding completion date.

    STATEMENT FROM THE OPERATING COMPANY OF: SNC SCANDIC COIN

    “An orderly winding-up, such as the one BitMart grandly and publicly described as ‘orderly’, must also be orderly in practice.” SNC SCANDIC COIN had already publicly and unequivocally called on BitMart to provide a specific explanation on 28 July 2026. To date, 3 August 2026, to the best of our knowledge, BitMart has provided us with neither the TXIDs nor a satisfactory, transaction-specific explanation. BitMart’s own pages show three precise transaction numbers, exact amounts, exact creation times, 0 out of 12 confirmations, the ongoing status ‘Processing’ and no TXID. The same overview shows a smaller SNC payout as having been successful, whilst the three larger transactions remain outstanding. An orderly winding-up of business operations must also be orderly, transparent and verifiable in practice. Nearly eight days without any blockchain transactions and several days without a response to a public request could strongly suggest that this can no longer be described as a normal settlement process. We demand not speculation, but verifiable facts and the immediate release of our own assets; anything else would constitute deliberate embezzlement and theft. Should this be the case, a criminal complaint would be filed, accompanied by a public media appeal and the publication in the media of photographs of the responsible operators of BitMart.” SCANDIC COIN / SNC: Office@ScandicCoin.dev

    Contact

    Lina Brugger
    Office@ScandicCoin.dev

  • Elite Garage Door Expert Expands Across Greater Houston Metro Area

    Known as one of Houston’s best garage door repair firms, Elite Garage Door Expert now operates from locations in Houston, Kingwood, and Pearland

    United States, 3rd Aug 2026 — Elite Garage Door Expert, considered by many to be Houston’s best garage door repair service, today announced that it has expanded its operation to two additional locations. In addition to its Houston headquarters, Elite Garage Door Expert is now operating garage repair service locations in Kingwood, Texas, and Pearland, Texas. The expansion is the result of growth as well as a desire to provide faster, same-day service to customers. The company also shared that it has expanded its team. Elite Garage Door Experts now has eight trained garage door technicians available to homeowners and businesses across Houston and the surrounding cities.

    “This expansion involved building our own local warehouse stocked with commonly needed garage door parts, springs, openers, rollers, cables, and hardware,” said a spokesperson for Elite Garage Door Expert, which aims to be the number one garage door service in Houston. “Having three locations, a larger technician team, and our own warehouse allows us to respond more quickly and complete most repairs on the first visit.” 

    The locally-owned Elite Garage Door Expert’s technicians are trained to provide reliable, honest, and professional residential garage door service in the Houston area, as well as commercial garage door service. Training is provided in-house, with the goal of ensuring service delivery that meets the company’s high standards. As the spokesperson put it, “Our goal is for every customer to receive the same level of professional service, honest recommendations, and quality workmanship. Our team is trained to correctly diagnose garage door problems, explain the available options, and complete repairs safely and professionally.”

    Elite Garage Door Expert’s main headquarters is located at: 8100 Washington Avenue, Suite 163, Houston, TX 77007

    To learn more, call (713) 572-7666 or visit https://elitegaragedoorexpert.com/

    Media Contact

    Organization: Elite Garage Door Expert

    Contact Person: Media Relations

    Website: https://elitegaragedoorexpert.com/

    Email: Send Email

    Contact Number: +17135727666

    Country:United States

    Release id:47825

    The post Elite Garage Door Expert Expands Across Greater Houston Metro Area appeared first on King Newswire. This content is provided by a third-party source.. King Newswire makes no warranties or representations in connection with it. King Newswire is a press release distribution agency and does not endorse or verify the claims made in this release. If you have any complaints or copyright concerns related to this article, please contact the company listed in the ‘Media Contact’ section

    file